A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated nationwide notice following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed loved ones residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations short article about René Collier and the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, seek out to make their household house. The case has become emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being constructed by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, an image which has due to the fact come to be emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were meant to Get visual proof of your wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Periods described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the drinking water all through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the positioning became The most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting rather that it's about guaranteeing that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few basically trying to create a loved ones household in accordance Along with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective are already performed determined by Expert information and authorized options. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into the sea in the course of a storm, never change the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for just a circumstance that a lot of observers see as progressively popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved with local advocacy on organizing and environmental difficulties, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very different Expert backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments and René Collier waded via waist-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.