A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, search for to build their spouse and children property. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of set up people. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up authorization by developing a wall further than the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment with a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such areas are issue to strict controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, particularly in a very delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partly designed, is in the proper situation. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their watch, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, where by views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, In line with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which includes since come to be emblematic with the intensity on the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they were meant to Collect visual evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Times claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the h2o in the course of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the site became The most hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this sort of actions had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined in detail from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential moment within the lawful timeline.
On the Main on the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as built, goes outside of what was approved and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing paperwork, maps, and circumstances connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to preparing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting rather that it is about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have described their prolonged-standing link to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply just seeking to establish a household house in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Region of Conservation and say that every one performs happen to be completed dependant on Specialist advice and accredited programs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including moving into The ocean throughout a storm, do not alter the fundamental information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web site happens to be a shorthand description for a condition Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times that a lot of observers see as increasingly frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation between personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Moments article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Beforehand been associated with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely distinctive professional backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical truth from the coastline plus the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the outcome stays unsure. The courtroom ought to decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and organizing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who should Dwell along with one another lengthy after the legal prices are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development operates at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre from the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will eventually eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will likely proceed to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.